1 Mucage

Essay Marxist Literary Theory

Marxist literary criticism is a loose term describing literary criticism based on socialist and dialectic theories. Marxist criticism views literary works as reflections of the social institutions from which they originate. According to Marxists, even literature itself is a social institution and has a specific ideological function, based on the background and ideology of the author.

The English literary critic and cultural theorist, Terry Eagleton, defines Marxist criticism this way:

Marxist criticism is not merely a 'sociology of literature', concerned with how novels get published and whether they mention the working class. Its aim is to explain the literary work more fully; and this means a sensitive attention to its forms, styles and, meanings. But it also means grasping those forms, styles and meanings as the product of a particular history.[1]

The simplest goals of Marxist literary criticism can include an assessment of the political 'tendency' of a literary work, determining whether its social content or its literary form are 'progressive'. It also includes analyzing the class constructs demonstrated in the literature.

History[edit]

Karl Marx's studies have provided a basis for much in socialist theory and research. Marxism aims to revolutionize the concept of work through creating a classless society built on control and ownership of the means of production. Marx believed that Economic Determinism, Dialectical Materialism and Class Struggle were the three principles that explained his theories. The Bourgeois (Dominant class who control and own the means of production) and Proletariat (Subordinate class: Don’t own and control the means of production) were the only two classes who engaged in hostile interaction to achieve class consciousness. Marx believed that all past history is a struggle between hostile and competing economic classes in state of change. Marx and Friedrich Engels collaborated to produce a range of publications based on capitalism, class struggles and socialist movements.

These theories and ideologies can be found within three published works:

The first publication Communist Manifesto (1848) argues that ‘the history of all hitherto existing societies is the history of class struggle’.[2] As class struggle is the engine room of history, to understand the course of history, one must analyse the class relations that typify different historical epochs, the antagonisms and forms of class struggle embodied in such class relations. This involves the development of class consciousness and follows the revolutionary movements that challenge the dominant classes. It extends to rating the success of these revolutions in developing new modes of production and forms of social organization.[3]

In contrast to the Manifesto, Preface to the Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy (1859), and Capital (1867) focus on the unfolding logic of a system, rather than class struggle. These provide an alternative account of historical development and emphasize the self-destructive contradictions and law of motion of specific modes of production.[4] The Preface argues that society’s economic organization consists of a distinctive pattern of forces and relations of productions. From this foundation arises a complex political and ideological superstructure,[5] where economic development impacts upon societal progress.

Capital was more concerned with the genesis and dynamic of capitalism. As Mclellan (1971) states, ‘it refers to class struggle mainly in the context of the struggle between capital and labour, within capitalism, rather than over its suppression’.[6]Capital was less concerned with forecasting how capitalism would be overthrown, than considering how it had developed and how it functioned.[7] The key to understanding this logic was the ‘commodity’ form of social relations – a form that was most fully developed only in capitalism.

Ideologies[edit]

It is through the theories of class struggle, politics and economics that Marxist literary criticism emerged. The thought behind Marxist Criticism is that works of literature are mere products of history that can be analyzed by looking at the social and material conditions in which they were constructed.[8] Marx’s Capital states that 'the mode of production of material life determines altogether the social, political, and intellectual life process. It is not the consciousness of men that determines their being, but on the contrary their social being, that determines their consciousness.' Put simply, the social situation of the author determines the types of characters that will develop, the political ideas displayed and the economical statements developed in the text.

The development of Marxist criticism[edit]

Although Marx and Friedrich Engels detailed theories of socialism in the mid-nineteenth century, it was not until the 1920s that Marxist literary theory was systematized. The greatest impetus for this standardization came after the October Revolution of 1917 in Russia. The event instigated a change in belief around socialist ideals in government and society.[9] While these ideals developed, socialist realism was accepted as the highest form of literature – a theory based on an art movement that depicted and glorified the proletariat's struggle towards societal progress. These ideas guided both literary creation and official literary criticism in the Soviet Union,[10] where works focused on the lives of the different classes. In the years since then, the beliefs of some Marxist schools regarding literary theory have been modified to acknowledge that literary creation is a result of both subjective inspiration and the objective influence of the writer's surroundings.[11] This system of belief relies on the social classes as well as the economic and political development of society. Thus, Marx’s theories intertwined with the emerging ideologies of the new Russian movement and spread throughout the world.

Writers influenced by Marxist criticism[edit]

In addition to being the guiding principle behind most literary works in Soviet Russia, Marxism also greatly influenced many Western writers. Richard Wright, Claude McKay, Jean-Paul Sartre, Simone de Beauvoir, and Bertold Brecht were deeply influenced by Marxist and socialist theories of the day, and much of this type of reflection is evident in their writings of the time.[12]

Suggested reading[edit]

  • The Communist Manifesto (Marx & Engels),
  • Capital (Volumes 1–3) (Marx & Engels),
  • The German Ideology (Marx),
  • Theses on Feuerbach (Marx),
  • The Revolutionary Ideas of Karl Marx (A. Callinicos, 2012).

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^T Eagleton, Marxism and Literary Criticism, Berkeley, U of California P, 1976
  2. ^Quoted Marx – W Duiker & J Spielvogel, The Essential World History, vol, II: since 1500, 3rd ed, Thomson Higher Education, Belmont, 2008, p. 428
  3. ^D Mclellan, The Thought of Karl Marx, Macmillan Press, London, 1971, p. 42
  4. ^R Stones, Key Sociological Thinkers, Macmillan Press, London, 1998, p. 24
  5. ^D Mclellan, p. 124
  6. ^As quoted in D Mclellan, p. 67
  7. ^I McIntosh, Classical Sociological Theory: A Reader, Edinburgh University Press, Great Britain, 1997, p. 73
  8. ^K Siegel, ‘Introduction to Modern Literary Theory’, viewed 15 March 2011, http://www.kristisiegel.com/theory.htm
  9. ^K Siegel
  10. ^K Siegel
  11. ^K Siegel
  12. ^K Siegel

References[edit]

  • Duiker, W & Spielvogel, J, The Essential World History, vol, II: since 1500, 3rd ed, Thomson Higher Education, Belmont, 2008.
  • Eagleton, T, Marxism and Literary Criticism, Berkeley, U of California P, 1976.
  • Hobsbawm, EJ, The Age of Capital, Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, 1975.
  • McIntosh, I, Classical Sociological Theory: A Reader, Edinburgh University Press, Great Britain, 1997.
  • Mclellan, D, The Thought of Karl Marx, Macmillan Press, London, 1971.
  • Siegal, K, ‘Introduction to Modern Literary Theory’, viewed 15 March 2011, http://www.kristisiegel.com/theory.htm
  • Stones, R, Key Sociological Thinkers, Macmillan Press, London, 1998.

External links[edit]

Marxist Criticism Essay

Marxist Criticism

Introduction

Marxist literary criticism is based upon the political and economic theories of the German philosopher Karl Marx. In works like The German Ideology and The Communist Manifesto, written with Frederick Engels , Marx proposes a model of history in which economic and political conditions determine social conditions. Marx and Engels were responding to social hardships stemming from the rise of capitalism. Appropriately, their theories are formulated specifically to analyze how society functions in a state of upheaval and constant change.

A materialist view of history

Using Hegel's theory of dialectic , which suggests that history progresses through the resolution of contradictions within a particular aspect of reality, Marx and Engels posit a materialist account of history that focuses upon the struggles and tensions within society. As society forms more complex modes of production, it becomes increasingly stratified; and the resulting tensions necessitate changes in society. For example, the introduction of heavy machinery into the feudal economic system fragmented existing social structures and necessitated a move towards capitalism.

The base and superstructure model

Within Marx's dialectical account of history is the idea that a given individual's social being is determined by larger political and economic forces. Marx writes that "it is not the consciousness of men that determines their being, but, on the contrary, their social being that determines consciousness." Simply stated, the social class into which a person is born determines her outlook and viewpoints.

Marx then expands this concept of determination into one of the central concepts of Marxism--that of base and superstructure. The base is the economic system on which the superstructure rests; cultural activities--such as philosophy or literature--belong in the superstructure. To Marxist critics, a society's economic base determines the interests and styles of its literature; it is this relationship between determining base and determined superstructure that is the main point of interest for Marxist critics.

Ideology

Marx believes that because the superstructure is determined by the base, it inevitably supports the ideologies of the base. Ideologies are the changing ideas, values, and feelings through which individuals experience their societies. They present the dominant ideas and values as the beliefs of society as a whole, thus preventing individuals from seeing how society actually functions. Literature, as a cultural production, is a form of ideology, one that legitimizes the power of the ruling class. In the eighteenth century, for example, literature was used by the English upper classes both to express and transmit the dominant value systems to the lower classes.

Georg Lukacs and the Social Realists

There is a great deal of difference in opinion among Marxist literary critics concerning the relationship...

Loading: Checking Spelling

0%

Read more

The Wrapped Golf Ball: A Marxist Literary Criticism

1256 words - 5 pages The philosopher Karl Marx once said, “It is not the consciousness of men that determines their being, but, on the contrary, their social being that determines their consciousness” (Marx). Marx argues that social circumstances determine one’s value and belief. Therefore, in his short story “Winter Dreams”, F. Scott Fitzgerald supports this Marxist theory by exposing that the proletariat is oppressed by the bourgeoisie’s ideology that the goal of...

The Importance of Distinction in Literary Theory and Criticism

1385 words - 6 pages It has been said, From the hour of the invention of printing, books, and not kings, were to rule the world. Weapons forged in the mind, keen-edged, and brighter than a sunbeam, were to supplant the sword and battle-axe. Books! lighthouses built on the sea of time! Books! by whose sorcery the whole pageantry of the world's history moves in solemn procession before our eyes. From their pages great souls look down in all their grandeur, undimmed by...

A Marxist Critical Approach to Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby

1726 words - 7 pages Karl Marx wrote in his 1859 ‘Towards a Critique of Political Economy’ that “it is not the consciousness of men that determines their existence but their social existence that determines their consciousness”. By stating this, Marx sheds light into the workings of ‘The Great Gatsby’ thus showing that the social circumstances in which the characters find themselves define them, and that these circumstances consist of core Marxist principles a...

A Critical Look at Marxism in Literature

1131 words - 5 pages A Critical Look at MarxismMarxism is a political and economic philosophy originating with one, Karl Marx. Karl Marx was a German philosopher who lived in the nineteenth century. Marx outlined that the capitalist economic system is...

Marxist Ideology

1282 words - 5 pages Finding Meaning In My Favourite Text. Music is an inevitable part of a human life, and you may not be “human” if you say you don’t like or listen to music- at least one type must appeal to you. I sometimes feel like music is in my genes, and I am an appreciator of music, as long as the good beat goes with some great lyrics, and that was why Paapa Kwaku hMensa’s “Richest Man”, which tells the unheard story of the poor man who is clearly fed up...

Examine Functionalist and Marxist explanations of the family.

662 words - 3 pages Functionalists and Marxist diverse had views on the family. Functionalist theory asserts that there will be a specific pattern of family organisation corresponding to different types of society. Hence there is a particular family form that best suits the conditions of industrial...

Marxist Media Theory.

4310 words - 17 pages Marxist Media TheoryDaniel Chandler"XIntroduction"XBase and superstructure"XMedia as means of production"XIdeology"XMedia as amplifiers"XThe constitution of the subject"XDifferences within Marxism"XThe Frankfurt School"XAlthusser"XGramsci and hegemony"XStuart Hall"XLimitations...

WPA in Guyana

922 words - 4 pages What the WPA, and the preceding actions of its constituents along with other sectors in Guyana, accomplished, was the visible representation of multi-racialism in its, rank and file, the importance, in the Guyana’s context of prominent black leaders opposing mainly black regime and the engagement of sections of the Indian indo-Guyanese shifting towards was at least at the non-electoral level. note that none of this multi-racial enthusiasm was...

Oedipus the King - Exploited or Exploiter?

920 words - 4 pages Oedipus the King - Exploited or Exploiter?       Great thinkers throughout history have contrived intricate theories of social order. By applying these particular ideologies to literature, we as readers are able to see a great work through the eyes of one or many of history's most celebrated philosophers. Sophocles' Oedipus the King has been open to many interpretations. With its intricate plot, archetypical tragic character, and lofty...

Was the nature and style of the leadership in the critical period of the Russian Revolution consistent with the ideals of the revolution?

831 words - 3 pages The leadership of the 1917 Russian Revolution greatly impacted the fate of the country, but the nature and style of the leadership meant that the revolution consistent with the Marxist model that it was supposedly based on. The Bolshevik Party manipulated the revolution to their individual goals, and in so doing the party gained control of the country and eventually bought it under dictatorial leadership. The revolution of 1917 was...

Ayn Rand´s Anthem: Failure in the Implementation of Marxist Ideals

787 words - 3 pages Ayn Rand, in Anthem, illustrates a futuristic, socialist society. In the novel, Rand destroys any sense of individuality and describes the social setbacks endured after living ‘only for the brotherhood’. The individual person fails to exist and is but a ‘we’ and recognized by a word and a series of numbers rather than a name. Additionally, she describes the horrors encountered within this different system of life: from reproduction methods to...

Leave a Comment

(0 Comments)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *